peterwindsor.com

…chance doesn't exist; there's always a cause and a reason for everything – Elahi

Thoughts on corner names and numbers

My thanks to Raymond Umbara (@Raymondu999) for pointing out a mistake in my Korean GP report (http://gpweek.com).  I described Seb Vettel brilliantly taking the lead from Lewis Hamilton at “Turn 3″ when I should have said “Turn 4″.

As ever with these things, I wondered why I had made that basic error.   And, as ever, I began to appreciate that there was more to the issue than I first realized, for my subconscious had driven me in a certain direction.

Turn 1 in Korea is basically a left-hander that takes the cars onto the “back” straight.  The FIA  decree this to be two corners – two left-handers joined by a short straight – but in reality this raises the question of “when is a corner not a corner?”.  For example:  the first corner at Suzuka was for many years known as exactly that.  If you wanted to get down to detail, you could sub-divide into into “1A and 1B”, which in my view perfectly captured the tightening-radius nature of the zone.   Today, the second part of the first corner is officially known as “Turn 2″ – which begs the question of where “Turn 1″ begins and ends.   For me, it is a similar situation in Korea at the end of the pit straight. You brake for the first corner – and if you get that right the second part more or less follows in sequence.   If a driver messes up the entry into “Turn 1″, and spears off to the outside of the short straight, has he in reality gone off at “Turn 1″ or on the approach to “Turn 2″?

All this confusion would be obviated by reverting to the traditional corner naming system.  I understand that commercial corner names – “Kodak Curve” or “Vodafone Viaduct” – would cause unnecessary friction within the F1 Economic Community, but natural corner names provide a perfect platform for race promoters – particularly the owners of expensive circuits built in new-frontier countries with no racing heritage.  Is there a better way to record the names of local towns and geography, important people behind the circuit and famous landmarks?  I wouldn’t have heard of “Lavant” village but for Goodwood – and nor would I be aware of Stowe school but for Silverstone.    If Korea’s Turn 1 and Turn 2, for example, were collectively known as “MacArthur Corner” we’d all have a bit of a chuckle every time they hit the brakes.

A final couple of thoughts.  Since when has a corner been a “turn”, anyway?   And would Eau Rouge be as dramatic if it was known, annoyingly, as “Turns TwoThreeandFour”? Paddock Bend at Brands Hatch always was – and still is – a great corner.  I shudder at the thought that one day it could be known simply as “Turn One”.

Single Post Navigation

One thought on “Thoughts on corner names and numbers

  1. So, so true.
    Peter please use your influence and make it your personal mission to ensure corner naming is re-implemented with urgency!

    Among my favourites were those names from Imola – Piratella, Aqua Minerali, Traguado and of course, Tamburello (a name which, even before ’94, had a certain aura of fear about it I felt)

    So much more evocative than numbers (though I would rather have numbers than sponsor names, I must admit).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 658 other followers

%d bloggers like this: